I love Ms Broyle’s list of children’s rights. I prefer to talk about “child safeguarding” or a “children’s charter of rights” rather than “parental rights” when it comes to gender ideology and its “confluence of influence”— everywhere a child turns, authority / aspirational figures and peers are inviting them to go to war with their own body— and a child deserves an advocate whose only agenda is the protection of their future thriving and options, separate from this cultural mass hysteria. Parents have rights, I get it… but even in custody battles after divorce, the framing (around here) is regardless of what parents feel entitled to, the court looks only at what best serves the child, in terms of time spent with each parent. Unfortunately, gender identity, to be suiting the adult activist’s agenda, inherently requires placing authority solely with the child. Parents are made to “genderflect” and bow to something of which they doubt the veracity and see clear dangers. Ms Broyle’s list makes the authoritative care / guidance / protection via a parent the child’s right… this is how I will frame it from now on. Could Ms Broyle provide a transcript of her “children’s charter of rights”? I’d like to submit it to my federal and provincial government.
I would like to print and frame your children’s bill of rights. Better yet- I want to put it on Billboards. Thank you for your work on this.
I love Ms Broyle’s list of children’s rights. I prefer to talk about “child safeguarding” or a “children’s charter of rights” rather than “parental rights” when it comes to gender ideology and its “confluence of influence”— everywhere a child turns, authority / aspirational figures and peers are inviting them to go to war with their own body— and a child deserves an advocate whose only agenda is the protection of their future thriving and options, separate from this cultural mass hysteria. Parents have rights, I get it… but even in custody battles after divorce, the framing (around here) is regardless of what parents feel entitled to, the court looks only at what best serves the child, in terms of time spent with each parent. Unfortunately, gender identity, to be suiting the adult activist’s agenda, inherently requires placing authority solely with the child. Parents are made to “genderflect” and bow to something of which they doubt the veracity and see clear dangers. Ms Broyle’s list makes the authoritative care / guidance / protection via a parent the child’s right… this is how I will frame it from now on. Could Ms Broyle provide a transcript of her “children’s charter of rights”? I’d like to submit it to my federal and provincial government.